Conceptual architecture
SEEP: conceptual history and instrument status.
The presence of SEEP in a conceptual title does not identify a current or authorized measurement instrument. FICND currently has no measurement instrument in force.
Names and scope
Distinguish the conceptual layer from historical instruments.
SEEP identifies a line of conceptual and instrumental development in the program. Macrofases do SEEP names a conceptual longitudinal formulation. Its documentary adoption does not activate an instrument.
SEEP-S identifies a historical line of instrument development. It has no current version in force, no authorized application and no completed psychometric validation. SEEP Master V4 is a distinct historical antecedent and is not one of the two SEEP-S formulations.
Documentary inventory
Two incompatible SEEP-S formulations remain traceable.
The version labels reverse the documentary chronology. The two formulations are incompatible and not interchangeable; results produced under them are not comparable. Cite the specific date and DOI rather than treating the labels as a sequence of improvements.
| Concept or record | Question or description |
|---|---|
| 5 April 2026 · labelled v2.3 | Six domains; 24 items; response scale 0–4. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19423514. |
| 7 April 2026 · labelled v1.0 | Three domains; 24 items; response scale 1–5. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19463312. |
Current limits
Citable documents do not authorize application.
The Portuguese instrument-status page identifies NSC-003/2026 v1.1 as the documentary basis for the stated restrictions. These English summaries neither reactivate the historical instruments nor supply items, scoring, thresholds or individual classifications.
No current instrument does not mean that empirical research has been abandoned, or that these historical formulations have been tested and shown ineffective. Future instruments require methodological development, validity assessment, applicable ethical review and their own documentary acts.